Governance

Anchor document

ipfs://QmUR1HsYzuewa5zPQy1uzhnmytygypTjy2Rm4qAa4iABxh
Hash matches the chain Open original

Document

Hash (BLAKE2b-256)
bbfdf3a36689dd22d22426f3762a13f4c2491a55eeed0141bbd8d27c6c79d0bf
Hash on chain
bbfdf3a36689dd22d22426f3762a13f4c2491a55eeed0141bbd8d27c6c79d0bf
Fetched from
https://gateway.pinata.cloud/ipfs/QmUR1HsYzuewa5zPQy1uzhnmytygypTjy2Rm4qAa4iABxh
Raw JSON-LD
{
  "@context": {
    "@language": "en-us",
    "CIP100": "https://github.com/cardano-foundation/CIPs/blob/master/CIP-0100/README.md#",
    "CIP129": "https://github.com/cardano-foundation/CIPs/blob/master/CIP-0129/README.md#",
    "CIP136": "https://github.com/cardano-foundation/CIPs/blob/master/CIP-0136/README.md#",
    "hashAlgorithm": "CIP100:hashAlgorithm",
    "body": {
      "@id": "CIP136:body",
      "@context": {
        "govActionId": "CIP129:governance-action-identifiers",
        "references": {
          "@id": "CIP100:references",
          "@container": "@set",
          "@context": {
            "GovernanceMetadata": "CIP100:GovernanceMetadataReference",
            "Other": "CIP100:OtherReference",
            "label": "CIP100:reference-label",
            "uri": "CIP100:reference-uri",
            "RelevantArticles": "CIP136:RelevantArticles"
          }
        },
        "summary": "CIP136:summary",
        "rationaleStatement": "CIP136:rationaleStatement",
        "precedentDiscussion": "CIP136:precedentDiscussion",
        "counterargumentDiscussion": "CIP136:counterargumentDiscussion",
        "conclusion": "CIP136:conclusion",
        "internalVote": {
          "@id": "CIP136:internalVote",
          "@container": "@set",
          "@context": {
            "constitutional": "CIP136:constitutional",
            "unconstitutional": "CIP136:unconstitutional",
            "abstain": "CIP136:abstain",
            "didNotVote": "CIP136:didNotVote",
            "againstVote": "CIP136:againstVote"
          }
        }
      }
    },
    "authors": {
      "@id": "CIP100:authors",
      "@container": "@set",
      "@context": {
        "did": "@id",
        "name": "http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/name",
        "witness": {
          "@id": "CIP100:witness",
          "@context": {
            "witnessAlgorithm": "CIP100:witnessAlgorithm",
            "publicKey": "CIP100:publicKey",
            "signature": "CIP100:signature"
          }
        }
      }
    }
  },
  "hashAlgorithm": "blake2b-256",
  "body": {
    "govActionId": "gov_action1k02990lhw6wh74t7c6ufw3mqaek9ujtvyan99dj5qv5kvcs7pn8svfsvefn",
    "summary": "Voting YES. Plutarch and Ply are open-source Cardano smart contract tools in active use by 26+ teams. MLabs is a proven maintainer with transparent prior funding. ₳1.16M for annual maintenance is proportionate. Transparency gaps are real but not blocking.",
    "rationaleStatement": "A [PDF version][pdf-link] of this rationale is also made available.\n\n[pdf-link]: https://ipfs.io/ipfs/QmVcQrq5MWBjGEhqVmmmbMKXpjxMmpkduxBPyoymH5Wmr8\n\nThis proposal funds maintenance of Plutarch (Haskell eDSL for efficient Cardano smart contracts) and Ply (serialization library for Plutarch scripts with CIP-57 blueprint support). These are established, open-source developer tools used by at least 26 teams building on Cardano.\nThe ask is modest at ₳1.16M for annual maintenance, from a proven maintainer with transparent prior funding history. The value proposition is clear: without ongoing compatibility work, teams building on Plutarch face expensive migrations, rewrites, and friction as Cardano's ledger and Plutus/UPLC evolve.\nI have the same transparency concerns I flag in every Intersect-administered proposal: thin budget detail, no ADA volatility policy, and milestones not visible in the public metadata. But at this scale, roughly $290K but, those concerns are proportionate, not blocking. This is exactly the kind of open-source tooling maintenance the Treasury should fund.\nPlutarch and Ply are real, open-source tools with proven adoption across the Cardano ecosystem. MLabs has maintained them through multiple protocol eras with transparent prior funding and demonstrated delivery. The ask ₳1.16M for annual maintenance is proportionate to the value at stake.\nThe transparency gaps I note (budget detail, ADA volatility policy, milestone visibility) are real but manageable at this scale. They are patterns across Intersect-administered proposals, not flaws unique to this one. I will continue to flag them, but I will not let them block well-justified, modest asks from proven maintainers.\nThis is the kind of proposal the Treasury should fund: established public infrastructure, proven team, clear additionality, and a reasonable price.",
    "references": [
      {
        "@type": "Other",
        "label": "Rationale PDF",
        "uri": "ipfs://QmVcQrq5MWBjGEhqVmmmbMKXpjxMmpkduxBPyoymH5Wmr8"
      }
    ]
  }
}