Anchor document

{
  "@context": {
    "@language": "en-us",
    "CIP100": "https://github.com/cardano-foundation/CIPs/blob/master/CIP-0100/README.md#",
    "CIP129": "https://github.com/cardano-foundation/CIPs/blob/master/CIP-0129/README.md#",
    "CIP136": "https://github.com/cardano-foundation/CIPs/blob/master/CIP-0136/README.md#",
    "hashAlgorithm": "CIP100:hashAlgorithm",
    "body": {
      "@id": "CIP136:body",
      "@context": {
        "govActionId": "CIP129:governance-action-identifiers",
        "references": {
          "@id": "CIP100:references",
          "@container": "@set",
          "@context": {
            "GovernanceMetadata": "CIP100:GovernanceMetadataReference",
            "Other": "CIP100:OtherReference",
            "label": "CIP100:reference-label",
            "uri": "CIP100:reference-uri",
            "RelevantArticles": "CIP136:RelevantArticles"
          }
        },
        "summary": "CIP136:summary",
        "rationaleStatement": "CIP136:rationaleStatement",
        "precedentDiscussion": "CIP136:precedentDiscussion",
        "counterargumentDiscussion": "CIP136:counterargumentDiscussion",
        "conclusion": "CIP136:conclusion",
        "internalVote": {
          "@id": "CIP136:internalVote",
          "@container": "@set",
          "@context": {
            "constitutional": "CIP136:constitutional",
            "unconstitutional": "CIP136:unconstitutional",
            "abstain": "CIP136:abstain",
            "didNotVote": "CIP136:didNotVote",
            "againstVote": "CIP136:againstVote"
          }
        }
      }
    },
    "authors": {
      "@id": "CIP100:authors",
      "@container": "@set",
      "@context": {
        "did": "@id",
        "name": "http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/name",
        "witness": {
          "@id": "CIP100:witness",
          "@context": {
            "witnessAlgorithm": "CIP100:witnessAlgorithm",
            "publicKey": "CIP100:publicKey",
            "signature": "CIP100:signature"
          }
        }
      }
    }
  },
  "hashAlgorithm": "blake2b-256",
  "body": {
    "govActionId": "gov_action1uzgqlh049u0j7epel29r425vyf9ttxmqwngw9kemyly0q6cwt5esqpwp09a",
    "summary": "I have decided to abstain. This proposal is too technical for me to objectively evaluate. While an enterprise JVM platform is promising, real market demand isn't guaranteed. Also, funding another node isn't a treasury priority right now. I'd reconsider in a future budget cycle.",
    "rationaleStatement": "A [PDF version][pdf-link] of this rationale is also made available.\n\n[pdf-link]: https://ipfs.io/ipfs/QmdcXQYonKFnZPAUED5Y5MtYh6E3285gxW9ZykWD19i5XY\n\nI have decided to abstain on this proposal. Because it is highly technical, it is very difficult for me to objectively evaluate it.\n\nThere are certainly good things here. The enterprise-grade JVM platform seems very promising and could serve as a bridge for institutional adoption. Still, building it does not automatically guarantee that there will be real market demand or real-world usage.\n\nAlso, a big part of this proposal is funding another node. Since the treasury has already funded alternative nodes like Dingo and Amuru, financing another one does not seem like a top ecosystem priority at this current stage.\n\nTaking our current treasury spending into consideration, I would be much more willing to vote \"yes\" on a proposal like this under more favorable market conditions and in a future budget cycle - specifically, a cycle where we don't already have two or more other nodes under development.",
    "references": [
      {
        "@type": "Other",
        "label": "Rationale PDF",
        "uri": "ipfs://QmdcXQYonKFnZPAUED5Y5MtYh6E3285gxW9ZykWD19i5XY"
      }
    ]
  }
}