Anchor document

{
  "@context": {
    "@language": "en-us",
    "CIP100": "https://github.com/cardano-foundation/CIPs/blob/master/CIP-0100/README.md#",
    "CIP136": "https://github.com/cardano-foundation/CIPs/blob/master/CIP-0136/README.md#",
    "hashAlgorithm": "CIP100:hashAlgorithm",
    "body": {
      "@id": "CIP136:body",
      "@context": {
        "references": {
          "@id": "CIP100:references",
          "@container": "@set",
          "@context": {
            "GovernanceMetadata": "CIP100:GovernanceMetadataReference",
            "Other": "CIP100:OtherReference",
            "label": "CIP100:reference-label",
            "uri": "CIP100:reference-uri",
            "RelevantArticles": "CIP136:RelevantArticles"
          }
        },
        "summary": "CIP136:summary",
        "rationaleStatement": "CIP136:rationaleStatement",
        "precedentDiscussion": "CIP136:precedentDiscussion",
        "counterargumentDiscussion": "CIP136:counterargumentDiscussion",
        "conclusion": "CIP136:conclusion",
        "internalVote": {
          "@id": "CIP136:internalVote",
          "@container": "@set",
          "@context": {
            "constitutional": "CIP136:constitutional",
            "unconstitutional": "CIP136:unconstitutional",
            "abstain": "CIP136:abstain",
            "didNotVote": "CIP136:didNotVote",
            "againstVote": "CIP136:againstVote"
          }
        }
      }
    },
    "authors": {
      "@id": "CIP100:authors",
      "@container": "@set",
      "@context": {
        "did": "@id",
        "name": "http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/name",
        "witness": {
          "@id": "CIP100:witness",
          "@context": {
            "witnessAlgorithm": "CIP100:witnessAlgorithm",
            "publicKey": "CIP100:publicKey",
            "signature": "CIP100:signature"
          }
        }
      }
    }
  },
  "hashAlgorithm": "blake2b-256",
  "body": {
    "govActionId": "b3d452bff7769d7f557ec6b8974760ee6c5e496c276652b654032966621e0ccf#2",
    "summary": "Cardano Curia finds the Treasury Withdrawal for Hardware Wallet Maintenance 2026 constitutional.",
    "rationaleStatement": "## What is being proposed\nThis Treasury Withdrawal funds twelve months of Cardano hardware-wallet compatibility, interoperability, support, and security-related maintenance. The requested amount is **1,310,960 ada**.\n\n## Constitutional assessment\nCardano Curia reviewed this action as a Treasury Withdrawal under the Constitution's governance-action standards and treasury-withdrawal requirements. The relevant requirements include a clear purpose and delivery period, disclosure of costs and refund circumstances, prior-funding disclosure, compliance with the applicable Net Change Limit, funded independent audit and oversight, designated administrators, and segregated auditable accounts delegated to the predefined abstain option while held before disbursement.\n\nContinuous Ledger and Trezor support protects secure user access as Cardano and vendor software evolve. The stated scope includes compatibility work, integration support, and vendor-required security or product audits.\n\nThe action is also consistent with the constitutional tenets concerning fair treatment, reasonable use of blockchain resources, recognition of ecosystem contributions, preservation of value, and long-term sustainability, provided that the published administration, reporting, audit, milestone, and return-to-treasury commitments remain binding throughout execution.\n\n## Determination\nCardano Curia finds the action **constitutional**. This is a determination of constitutional compliance, not a guarantee of delivery performance or financial return.",
    "precedentDiscussion": "This decision supports the precedent that Treasury Withdrawals for ecosystem infrastructure, governance operations, adoption, or market development may be constitutional where their purpose, administration, auditability, oversight, delivery controls, and return mechanisms are sufficiently specified.",
    "counterargumentDiscussion": "Material counterarguments concern delivery risk, concentration of administrative authority, cost control, conflicts of interest, and whether oversight commitments will be implemented exactly as published. These concerns do not establish a constitutional conflict where segregated custody, milestone controls, public reporting, independent assurance, and return-to-treasury mechanisms are binding and auditable.",
    "conclusion": "Cardano Curia finds governance action b3d452bff7769d7f557ec6b8974760ee6c5e496c276652b654032966621e0ccf#2 constitutional and records five internal votes for constitutional, with no votes for unconstitutional or abstain.",
    "internalVote": [
      {
        "constitutional": 5,
        "unconstitutional": 0,
        "abstain": 0,
        "didNotVote": 0,
        "againstVote": 0
      }
    ],
    "references": [
      {
        "@type": "RelevantArticles",
        "label": "Cardano Constitution v2.4 — Tenets, Governance Action Standards, Treasury Withdrawal Standards and Guardrails",
        "uri": "https://cardano.org/constitution/"
      },
      {
        "@type": "GovernanceMetadata",
        "label": "Governance action explorer record",
        "uri": "https://adastat.net/governances/b3d452bff7769d7f557ec6b8974760ee6c5e496c276652b654032966621e0ccf2"
      },
      {
        "@type": "Other",
        "label": "CIP-0136 governance metadata vocabulary",
        "uri": "https://cips.cardano.org/cip/CIP-0136"
      }
    ]
  },
  "authors": [
    {
      "name": "Cardano Curia"
    }
  ]
}