Anchor document

{
  "@context": {
    "@language": "en-us",
    "CIP100": "https://github.com/cardano-foundation/CIPs/blob/master/CIP-0100/README.md#",
    "CIP129": "https://github.com/cardano-foundation/CIPs/blob/master/CIP-0129/README.md#",
    "CIP136": "https://github.com/cardano-foundation/CIPs/blob/master/CIP-0136/README.md#",
    "hashAlgorithm": "CIP100:hashAlgorithm",
    "body": {
      "@id": "CIP136:body",
      "@context": {
        "govActionId": "CIP129:governance-action-identifiers",
        "references": {
          "@id": "CIP100:references",
          "@container": "@set",
          "@context": {
            "GovernanceMetadata": "CIP100:GovernanceMetadataReference",
            "Other": "CIP100:OtherReference",
            "label": "CIP100:reference-label",
            "uri": "CIP100:reference-uri",
            "RelevantArticles": "CIP136:RelevantArticles"
          }
        },
        "summary": "CIP136:summary",
        "rationaleStatement": "CIP136:rationaleStatement",
        "precedentDiscussion": "CIP136:precedentDiscussion",
        "counterargumentDiscussion": "CIP136:counterargumentDiscussion",
        "conclusion": "CIP136:conclusion",
        "internalVote": {
          "@id": "CIP136:internalVote",
          "@container": "@set",
          "@context": {
            "constitutional": "CIP136:constitutional",
            "unconstitutional": "CIP136:unconstitutional",
            "abstain": "CIP136:abstain",
            "didNotVote": "CIP136:didNotVote",
            "againstVote": "CIP136:againstVote"
          }
        }
      }
    },
    "authors": {
      "@id": "CIP100:authors",
      "@container": "@set",
      "@context": {
        "did": "@id",
        "name": "http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/name",
        "witness": {
          "@id": "CIP100:witness",
          "@context": {
            "witnessAlgorithm": "CIP100:witnessAlgorithm",
            "publicKey": "CIP100:publicKey",
            "signature": "CIP100:signature"
          }
        }
      }
    }
  },
  "hashAlgorithm": "blake2b-256",
  "body": {
    "govActionId": "gov_action105mjyzm3spjppny2m776lwk5jnsuu07uva9tz0yg5u4nkf770rvsql5raht",
    "summary": "Cardano Curia finds the proposed \"Reimburse Ikigai Info Governance Action Deposit.\" Treasury Withdrawal Governance Action constitutional.",
    "rationaleStatement": "\"Reimburse Ikigai Info Governance Action Deposit.\" (gov_action105mjyzm3spjppny2m776lwk5jnsuu07uva9tz0yg5u4nkf770rvsql5raht) is a Treasury Withdrawal Governance Action requesting 103,000 ada. The stated purpose is to reimburse the 100,000 ada governance-action deposit associated with the September 2024 \"Cardanoの生きがい - Ikigai -\" Info Governance Action, together with an additional 3,000 ada described as compensation for staking rewards forgone since the deposit was not returned.\n\nCardano Curia finds that the action satisfies the applicable requirements of Article II, Section 6 and Article II, Section 7 of the Cardano Constitution.\n\nArticle II.6 requires governance actions to follow a standardized and legible format, to reference an immutable document through a URL and hash, and to provide sufficient rationale including a title, abstract, justification, and relevant supporting materials. The proposal is anchored to a content-addressed IPFS document at https://most-brass-sun.quicknode-ipfs.com/ipfs/QmSy2CiQhPBzzNLKDFVvMQaDb1FQDbmn9bJf6fVntVAQ1t with the blake2b-256 hash abaf67cde8defc914712009094cd3805bcf8911d3fa79c6edfd6c975dcf9d471. The anchored document provides the required description and justification for the withdrawal.\n\nArticle II.7.1 requires a Treasury Withdrawal to specify its terms, including the purpose, delivery period, relevant costs and expenses, and circumstances under which funds might be refunded to the Cardano Treasury. Those terms are sufficiently specified here. The purpose is a one-time reimbursement; delivery occurs immediately as part of enactment; the requested withdrawal itself constitutes the relevant amount; no additional operating costs or expenses are identified; and the proposal states that there are no circumstances under which the payment would be refunded to the Treasury. Because the action funds no continuing programme of activities, there is no additional delivery period, milestone schedule, or programme expenditure to specify.\n\nArticle II.7.2 requires disclosure of whether the prospective recipient has received ada from the Cardano Treasury within the preceding 24 months. The proposal expressly states that the recipient has not previously received Treasury funds.\n\nArticle II.7.3 requires a Net Change Limit to be set and prohibits Treasury Withdrawals from exceeding the applicable limit. The requested 103,000 ada is within the applicable Net Change Limit. The request is denominated in ada, consistent with the Treasury guardrails.\n\nArticles II.7.4, II.7.5, and II.7.6 must be applied to the actual structure of this withdrawal. This action does not fund an ongoing programme, create a discretionary spending mandate, or establish a sequence of later disbursements. It directs a single, unconditional payment from the Cardano Treasury to the designated recipient, completed by the protocol upon enactment. The amount, destination, and completion of the transfer are permanently and independently verifiable on-chain.\n\nArticle II.7.4 requires an allocation of ada to cover periodic independent audits and the implementation of oversight metrics as to the use of Treasury funds. In this specific circumstance, there is no continuing Treasury-funded activity, periodic expenditure, or discretionary use of Treasury funds to audit after enactment. The complete use of the Treasury funds contemplated by the governance action is the transfer itself. Its execution and destination can be independently verified by any observer from the immutable ledger record. Cardano Curia therefore finds that no separate audit allocation is required to achieve the constitutional audit and oversight function for this singular automated reimbursement.\n\nArticle II.7.5 requires one or more administrators responsible for monitoring how funds are used and ensuring that deliverables are achieved. The proposal names the DReps as Administrator. Cardano Curia does not rely on that designation. DReps determine whether to approve the governance action but do not exercise continuing custody or discretion over the funds after enactment. Here the sole deliverable is the payment specified by the action. The Cardano protocol executes that payment and the ledger provides the definitive evidence that the deliverable occurred. On these narrowly defined facts, the protocol performs the administrative and deliverable-assurance function contemplated by Article II.7.5.\n\nArticle II.7.6 applies while Treasury funds are being held by an administrator prior to further disbursement to a Treasury Withdrawal Recipient. No intermediate custody exists in this action. The funds move directly from the Cardano Treasury to the identified recipient upon enactment. Accordingly, the separate-account and delegation requirements in Article II.7.6 are not triggered.\n\nCardano Curia emphasizes that this treatment of Article II.7.4 through Article II.7.6 is narrow and specific to a direct, immediate, unconditional Treasury-to-recipient payment whose entire execution is objectively verifiable on-chain. It does not reduce the audit, administration, custody, reporting, or oversight requirements applicable to ordinary Treasury Withdrawals funding programmes of work, milestones, future expenditures, or administrator-controlled disbursements.",
    "precedentDiscussion": "This decision recognizes a narrow distinction between Treasury Withdrawals that finance an ongoing programme of work and Treasury Withdrawals whose sole deliverable is one direct payment executed at enactment. In an ordinary programme, Article II.7.4 and Article II.7.5 provide essential safeguards because Treasury funds remain subject to later expenditure, administration, monitoring, and delivery risk. Those safeguards must not be displaced merely because the initial Treasury transaction is visible on-chain.\n\nWhere, however, the governance action itself completely determines the amount and recipient, the transfer is executed automatically by the protocol, no intermediary holds the funds, and there is no later Treasury-funded activity to administer, the immutable ledger record can itself provide the relevant verification of delivery. Article II.7.6 remains applicable according to its express trigger: funds being held by an administrator prior to further disbursement. A direct Treasury-to-recipient payment does not create that custody arrangement.\n\nThis interpretation is limited to materially equivalent direct-payment circumstances and must not be used to avoid the accountability requirements applicable to Treasury-funded programmes involving ongoing work, discretionary expenditure, milestones, administrators, or later distributions.",
    "counterargumentDiscussion": "One counterargument is that Article II.7.4 expressly states that Treasury Withdrawals shall include an allocation of ada for periodic independent audits and oversight metrics, and therefore a separate allocation should be required regardless of the structure of the withdrawal. Cardano Curia considers the requirement in the context of the Treasury use actually authorized by this action. The withdrawal is exhausted by one automated payment at enactment. There are no periodic expenditures, no programme accounts, and no subsequent Treasury-funded activity to inspect. The ledger itself permanently records the amount and destination. In this narrowly defined circumstance, requiring a separate periodic audit budget would add an additional expenditure without creating additional meaningful oversight of the use authorized by the governance action.\n\nA second counterargument is that Article II.7.5 expressly requires an administrator and that the protocol cannot perform that role. Cardano Curia does not treat the DReps as custodial administrators merely because the proposal names them. The constitutional function identified by Article II.7.5 is monitoring the use of Treasury funds and ensuring the deliverable is achieved. Here there is no post-enactment discretionary use to monitor and the only deliverable is the transfer itself. The protocol executes the transfer and the ledger evidences its completion. Cardano Curia therefore finds the required function fulfilled on these facts.\n\nA further issue is the proposal's characterization of the original deposit loss as resulting from a \"bug in the code of the Cardano node\". The constitutional determination does not depend on adopting that technical characterization. The relevant constitutional question is whether the present Treasury Withdrawal complies with the requirements governing its submission and execution. The justification offered for the withdrawal is that an early governance participant should be reimbursed for the 100,000 ada deposit that was not returned. Whether that reimbursement, including the additional 3,000 ada, is an appropriate policy choice or use of Treasury funds is for the Cardano Community and DReps to determine within the constitutional framework; it is not, by itself, a basis for the Constitutional Committee to find the action unconstitutional.",
    "conclusion": "Cardano Curia finds the proposed \"Reimburse Ikigai Info Governance Action Deposit.\" Treasury Withdrawal Governance Action constitutional under Article II.6 and Article II.7.1 through Article II.7.6. The action is a single, immediate, unconditional, and objectively verifiable reimbursement. Its direct execution by the Cardano protocol leaves no continuing Treasury-funded programme, no discretionary administration, and no intermediate administrator custody. The interpretation applied to Article II.7.4 through Article II.7.6 is limited to these specific circumstances and does not diminish the accountability requirements applicable to ordinary Treasury-funded programmes.",
    "internalVote": {
      "constitutional": 5,
      "unconstitutional": 0,
      "abstain": 0,
      "didNotVote": 0,
      "againstVote": 0
    },
    "references": [
      {
        "@type": "RelevantArticles",
        "label": "Cardano Constitution",
        "uri": "ipfs://bafkreieyuknozbtewyurfqoagvplvykadn6a4u6wglupavdz46bbsnnl6e"
      },
      {
        "@type": "GovernanceMetadata",
        "label": "Proposal Metadata Anchor URI",
        "uri": "https://most-brass-sun.quicknode-ipfs.com/ipfs/QmSy2CiQhPBzzNLKDFVvMQaDb1FQDbmn9bJf6fVntVAQ1t"
      },
      {
        "@type": "GovernanceMetadata",
        "label": "Proposal Metadata Anchor Hash",
        "uri": "abaf67cde8defc914712009094cd3805bcf8911d3fa79c6edfd6c975dcf9d471"
      }
    ]
  },
  "authors": [
    {
      "name": "Cardano Curia"
    }
  ]
}