Anchor document

{
  "@context": {
    "@language": "en-us",
    "CIP100": "https://github.com/cardano-foundation/CIPs/blob/master/CIP-0100/README.md#",
    "CIP129": "https://github.com/cardano-foundation/CIPs/blob/master/CIP-0129/README.md#",
    "CIP136": "https://github.com/cardano-foundation/CIPs/blob/master/CIP-0136/README.md#",
    "hashAlgorithm": "CIP100:hashAlgorithm",
    "body": {
      "@id": "CIP136:body",
      "@context": {
        "govActionId": "CIP129:governance-action-identifiers",
        "references": {
          "@id": "CIP100:references",
          "@container": "@set",
          "@context": {
            "GovernanceMetadata": "CIP100:GovernanceMetadataReference",
            "Other": "CIP100:OtherReference",
            "label": "CIP100:reference-label",
            "uri": "CIP100:reference-uri",
            "RelevantArticles": "CIP136:RelevantArticles"
          }
        },
        "summary": "CIP136:summary",
        "rationaleStatement": "CIP136:rationaleStatement",
        "precedentDiscussion": "CIP136:precedentDiscussion",
        "counterargumentDiscussion": "CIP136:counterargumentDiscussion",
        "conclusion": "CIP136:conclusion",
        "internalVote": {
          "@id": "CIP136:internalVote",
          "@container": "@set",
          "@context": {
            "constitutional": "CIP136:constitutional",
            "unconstitutional": "CIP136:unconstitutional",
            "abstain": "CIP136:abstain",
            "didNotVote": "CIP136:didNotVote",
            "againstVote": "CIP136:againstVote"
          }
        }
      }
    },
    "authors": {
      "@id": "CIP100:authors",
      "@container": "@set",
      "@context": {
        "did": "@id",
        "name": "http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/name",
        "witness": {
          "@id": "CIP100:witness",
          "@context": {
            "witnessAlgorithm": "CIP100:witnessAlgorithm",
            "publicKey": "CIP100:publicKey",
            "signature": "CIP100:signature"
          }
        }
      }
    }
  },
  "hashAlgorithm": "blake2b-256",
  "body": {
    "govActionId": "gov_action1k02990lhw6wh74t7c6ufw3mqaek9ujtvyan99dj5qv5kvcs7pn8sqcw2nc5",
    "summary": "Voting NO. Wirex is a capable company with a real vision, Cardano-native payments for 7M users. But ₳3.85M as a pure grant to a commercial entity with no return mechanism, no open-source specifics, and no budget transparency doesn't meet Treasury standards.",
    "rationaleStatement": "A [PDF version][pdf-link] of this rationale is also made available.\n\n[pdf-link]: https://ipfs.io/ipfs/QmUtj59f2GpnZpdh1RSp7qbqTJzyqow8F5jEtM9NyPXcyS\n\nWirex addresses a real and important gap in Cardano's ecosystem: the lack of integrated real-world payment rails. A regulated fintech with 7M users, 1.5M cards issued, and $20B+ in transaction volume building Cardano-native payments infrastructure is not a frivolous idea. The intent is genuine and the problem is worth solving.\nHowever, this proposal asks the Treasury to fund a commercial company's infrastructure build with no return mechanism, no detailed open-source commitments, no evidence of productive ecosystem effects, and no transparency on how the budget is spent. The \"public good\" framing is thin, what Wirex keeps proprietary (banking rails, Visa network, compliance infrastructure, user relationships) is far more valuable than what they promise to open-source. And what they promise to open-source lacks specifics: no license, no repository, no architecture detail.\nFor ₳3.85M, I expect proportionate value capture. A commercial beneficiary with demonstrated revenue should share upside, not receive a pure grant. This proposal does not meet that standard.\n\nWirex is a capable company addressing a real problem. The vision of Cardano-powered real-world payments is compelling. But the structure of this proposal, a pure grant to a commercial entity with no return mechanism, no detailed open-source commitments, no productive ecosystem evidence, and no budget transparency, does not meet the standard for Treasury funding.\nThe Cardano Treasury is not a venture capital fund. It is public capital meant to create public goods, share upside with the ecosystem, and avoid creating private gatekeepers. This proposal fails on all three counts.\nIf Wirex resubmits with open-source specifics, a revenue-sharing or repayment mechanism, named downstream integrators, a detailed budget, an ADA volatility policy, and a co-funding commitment, I will evaluate it with a genuinely open mind. The problem is worth solving. This proposal, as structured, does not solve it fairly for the Treasury.",
    "references": [
      {
        "@type": "Other",
        "label": "Rationale PDF",
        "uri": "ipfs://QmUtj59f2GpnZpdh1RSp7qbqTJzyqow8F5jEtM9NyPXcyS"
      }
    ]
  }
}