Anchor document

{
  "@context": {
    "CIP100": "https://github.com/cardano-foundation/CIPs/blob/master/CIP-0100/README.md#",
    "hashAlgorithm": "CIP100:hashAlgorithm",
    "body": {
      "@id": "CIP100:body",
      "@context": {
        "references": {
          "@id": "CIP100:references",
          "@container": "@set",
          "@context": {
            "GovernanceMetadata": "CIP100:GovernanceMetadataReference",
            "Other": "CIP100:OtherReference",
            "label": "CIP100:reference-label",
            "uri": "CIP100:reference-uri",
            "referenceHash": {
              "@id": "CIP100:referenceHash",
              "@context": {
                "hashDigest": "CIP100:hashDigest",
                "hashAlgorithm": "CIP100:hashAlgorithm"
              }
            }
          }
        },
        "comment": "CIP100:comment",
        "externalUpdates": {
          "@id": "CIP100:externalUpdates",
          "@context": {
            "title": "CIP100:update-title",
            "uri": "CIP100:uri"
          }
        }
      }
    },
    "authors": {
      "@id": "CIP100:authors",
      "@container": "@set",
      "@context": {
        "name": "http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/name",
        "witness": {
          "@id": "CIP100:witness",
          "@context": {
            "witnessAlgorithm": "CIP100:witnessAlgorithm",
            "publicKey": "CIP100:publicKey",
            "signature": "CIP100:signature"
          }
        }
      }
    }
  },
  "authors": [],
  "body": {
    "comment": "After further consideration, I am changing my vote from NO to ABSTAIN.\n\nMy original concern remains: for a Treasury request of this size, especially one connected to future commercial revenue and institutional growth, I believe there should ideally be a clearer value-return mechanism for the Cardano Treasury, such as repayment, revenue sharing, equity, or another enforceable structure.\n\nThat said, I also recognize the strong engagement this proposal has generated across the community, the team’s visible effort to communicate and respond to feedback, and the broad acknowledgment from many community members regarding the potential benefits of the project.\n\nGiven how closely divided the vote is, I do not want to dismiss the community’s support or the potential strategic value of the proposal. At the same time, I am not fully comfortable voting YES without a more direct Treasury return structure.\n\nFor these reasons, I believe ABSTAIN is the most appropriate position."
  },
  "hashAlgorithm": "blake2b-256"
}